The (Almost) Lost Episode - Deep Cover (1992) vs. Everyone Says I Love You (1996)

The (Almost) Lost Episode - Deep Cover (1992) vs. Everyone Says I Love You (1996)

Thomas and Frank review two more 90s films while battling technical issues that threaten to ruin their recording.

First, Frank reviews "Deep Cover" (1992). Then, Thomas reviews "Everyone Says I Love You" (1996).

It's a slightly problematic 90s Double Feature, and it starts right now!

-----

Meet Your Double Feature is a double-blind movie review podcast hosted by brothers Thomas and Frank. Thomas is an event producer and broadcaster from Chicago. Frank is an independent filmmaker living in Los Angeles.

-----

For more information on where to watch Nate and Moriah in Venice, visit https://www.sardonicmp.com/


Follow us on Socials at:

Instagram.com/meetyourdoublefeature

https://bsky.app/profile/mydfpod.bsky.social


Music for tonight's show licensed through Soundstripe

"The Shakedown" by Dresden, The Flamingo

"Soul Tonic" by Cast of Characters

"Sophistikitty" by Cast of Characters


(00:00) Intro

(03:59) Deep Cover (1992)

(42:54) Everyone Says I Love You (1996)

(50:13) Final Scores and Wrap-Up

(55:53) Outro


00:00:09
Tonight on Meet Your Double Feature, policeman Russell

00:00:13
Stevens goes undercover to infiltrate a dangerous LA drug

00:00:17
cartel in Bill Duke's deep cover.

00:00:20
Then an upscale New York family muses about the trials and

00:00:24
tribulations of love in Woody Allen's Everyone Says I Love

00:00:29
You. It's a somewhat problematic

00:00:31
double feature, and it starts right now.

00:00:43
Hello and welcome to Meet Your Double Feature, a double-blind

00:00:46
movie review podcast. My name is Thomas.

00:00:49
I will be one of your two hosts for the show this evening.

00:00:51
In a moment, I'm going to sit down with my brother Frank, an

00:00:54
independent filmmaker from LA, as we discuss two more films in

00:00:58
our blind review series. The way things work here is that

00:01:02
each episode, Frank and I swap recommendations for films that

00:01:05
neither of us has previously seen, and we find out in real

00:01:08
time through conversation whether the ones we picked were

00:01:11
a new favorite for the other person or just a complete waste

00:01:14
of time. We're still also in our

00:01:16
Forgotten 90s theme, so each episode focuses on films

00:01:19
specifically from the 1990s. We're about halfway through that

00:01:22
first season, and we're keeping track of the total review score

00:01:25
points along the way. For those who are keeping track,

00:01:28
Frank is actually currently down about four or five points, so

00:01:31
we'll see if he can make up the difference starting in this

00:01:33
episode. Now, if you are a new listener

00:01:35
to the show, I will say this is maybe not the best jumping on

00:01:39
point. I'd recommend either our first

00:01:41
episode or even the one right before this one.

00:01:43
Episode 4. And the reason for that is that

00:01:46
tonight's episode is a bit irregular.

00:01:48
We actually almost had to scrap the entire thing due to multiple

00:01:52
technical issues that we encountered when handling the

00:01:55
original recording. The biggest issue is that in the

00:01:58
second-half of the show, when I talked about the film that Frank

00:02:01
asked me to review, Woody Allen's 1996 film Everyone Says

00:02:04
I Love You, the audio from that half of the recording got

00:02:08
corrupted and we suffered some data loss that basically made

00:02:11
the audio unusable. I spent a long time trying to

00:02:13
fix it and I did bring it back to a point where it was

00:02:16
listenable, but because it wasn't up to the audio standard

00:02:20
of the show, I decided not to use it.

00:02:22
What Frank and I did instead is we actually got together a few

00:02:25
weeks after the first recording to re record a sort of

00:02:28
supplement that takes its place. It's a little bit shorter, sort

00:02:31
of just a summary of that initial conversation.

00:02:34
I didn't want to do an entire retake because so much of the

00:02:38
magic of our show is that moment of realization where you find

00:02:41
out what the movie was that the other person watched and what

00:02:44
they thought of it. So for the sake of the overall

00:02:46
continuity of our program, I wanted to make sure we included

00:02:49
something for that film so you know what I thought about it and

00:02:52
how it was scored and everything.

00:02:53
But you'll notice that that half of the show is trimmed down and

00:02:56
is something we recorded long after the fact.

00:02:59
The other problem, which we didn't even notice until after

00:03:02
that was re recorded, is that in the first half of the show,

00:03:05
Frank's audio was being picked up by the wrong microphone.

00:03:08
So occasionally during his review of deep cover in the

00:03:11
first half of the program, his voice kind of flickers in and

00:03:14
out and I had to boost that audio a bit, which created some

00:03:16
mild artifacting in the background.

00:03:18
Suffice to say, this was sort of a cursed recording again.

00:03:21
We almost lost the entire episode as a result of this, but

00:03:24
after a number of hours of work, we have restored it to perfectly

00:03:28
listenable quality. But that's why I would say that

00:03:30
if this is your first time, I really would recommend checking

00:03:33
out one of our other episodes first, just to get a sense of

00:03:35
how things normally sound over here.

00:03:37
None of that is to say that you will not enjoy tonight's

00:03:39
episode. There was some really fun

00:03:40
conversation captured both in the initial recording about Deep

00:03:43
Cover and in the one we recorded later summarizing our

00:03:46
conversation about Woody Allen. So with all of that preamble out

00:03:50
of the way, here is tonight's episode of Meet Your Double

00:03:53
Feature. All right, Frank, welcome back.

00:04:01
Episode 5 already here for Meet Your Double Feature.

00:04:04
How are you doing today? I didn't expect that.

00:04:09
Yeah, I don't usually add that just so you don't tell me how

00:04:12
you were yesterday. How are you doing now today

00:04:15
specifically? I'm good.

00:04:20
I was worried because if I'd asked about the wrong day it

00:04:22
could have been a different answer.

00:04:23
Yeah, yes. You never know.

00:04:24
You never know. Any who we got a movie show, so

00:04:28
we're going to start that now. Apparently, yeah.

00:04:30
All right, so for episode 5, we again, we talked about the

00:04:34
movies we selected at the end of our last episode.

00:04:36
So today you're going to be discussing Deep Cover from 1992,

00:04:40
which I recommended. But I'll be honest, I no longer

00:04:43
remember what Deep Cover is or why I selected it, so maybe you

00:04:47
can tell me. I I was going to ask what the

00:04:52
motivation behind this pic was. I have to imagine it had

00:04:55
something to do with the cast. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

00:04:57
Cuz this is I want to say it's Laurence Fishburne and what's

00:05:02
his name do? You want me to tell you, or do

00:05:05
you just want to keep guessing? Just leave the audience in

00:05:08
suspense. I want to say it's Jeff.

00:05:10
Goldblum. Yes, yes it is.

00:05:12
OK, that's what it is. I think I saw those two.

00:05:14
I thought that was an interesting pairing and there

00:05:17
was like a cool cover art for the Criterion version of the

00:05:21
film. I think that's all I went off of

00:05:22
for this one. Yeah, that I actually didn't

00:05:24
know that until after I watched it.

00:05:26
But this was added into the Criterion Collection in 2021,

00:05:31
which was like the first like 4K digital restoration of the

00:05:35
movie. Interesting.

00:05:36
And it's actually correction on the actors.

00:05:40
It's Larry Fishburne, as he's credited in this movie for some

00:05:44
reason. What?

00:05:45
He goes by. Larry, I guess he did for a

00:05:48
while. I don't know how long in his

00:05:50
acting career, but it's it's Jeff Goldblum and Larry

00:05:54
Fishburn. That's weird.

00:05:56
What I can't think of another example of that of someone

00:05:58
making it into multiple starring roles and then trying to change

00:06:02
their name, you know? Yeah, I know what and this.

00:06:06
Apparently this was the last film where he was credited as

00:06:09
Larry. Oh, RIP Larry Fishburn.

00:06:12
It's his final performance. His swan Swan.

00:06:16
We'll never see him again, but. Morpheus who?

00:06:22
That's weird. OK, so I know that again, from

00:06:25
what I can recall now that I've been reminded, I think this was

00:06:28
like a criminal drug cartel kind of movie.

00:06:32
Is that is that the right direction?

00:06:34
It very much is that that's exactly what it is.

00:06:40
I was getting similar vibes to grifters.

00:06:44
Oh, bad sign. Check out Episode 2 for our

00:06:49
thoughts on directories. Yes.

00:06:52
And I was like, at first I was like, why does he keep

00:06:56
recommending these movies to me? That's a long con.

00:07:01
I'm just going to make you watch a series of terrible crime

00:07:03
films. I got to be honest, early on I

00:07:07
was like, So what are the rules if I just turn this off?

00:07:11
Because I was like wow, but I didn't.

00:07:15
OK, OK. I think there should be Now we

00:07:19
got a rules conversation. I think not finishing should be

00:07:23
allowed, but that can't mean it's like a zero, you know what

00:07:26
I mean? Like if.

00:07:26
Oh yeah, yeah, sure. Maybe you can tap out and just

00:07:29
you just knock it away with like a three, just some sort of flat

00:07:33
score. I mean, I would have found

00:07:35
something to talk about and it wasn't, it wasn't like in

00:07:39
overwhelming Urge, but like in like the first 10-15 minutes it

00:07:45
was just not. I was not vibing with the movie

00:07:47
at all. But I'm glad I stuck it out

00:07:49
because. OK.

00:07:51
It went into some interesting places.

00:07:53
So what? What about this first opening?

00:07:55
15 minutes with such a, with such a turn off I.

00:07:58
Mean it's just the type of movie it is.

00:07:59
It's just like I found myself sitting there watching it and

00:08:03
I'm like, who likes these? He's about criminal underworld.

00:08:13
Well, yeah, but I mean, it's like this one, it tries to give

00:08:19
it this very rounded, realistic look at these types of things,

00:08:25
you know, at this kind of like crime and lifestyle.

00:08:29
But it's like you're seeing it through this very filmic lens.

00:08:32
So, you know, it's like heightened and yeah, it just to

00:08:37
me as a viewer creates such a disconnect.

00:08:41
And it's just, I don't know, I don't think I'm like an overly

00:08:45
sensitive viewer, but it's just a lot of uncomfortable stuff,

00:08:48
especially this one because it's like essentially to give you the

00:08:51
loose framework of the story here, Larry.

00:08:55
Larry Fishburne is. Good old Larry.

00:08:57
Good. Old Larry, He's a cop who is

00:09:02
sent undercover to disrupt a drugs and narcotics syndicate in

00:09:09
LA, and he doesn't want to do it.

00:09:13
Like OK, I'm tired, boss. Exactly.

00:09:19
And like it's funny too, because like there's there's voice over

00:09:24
narration. So it is kind of a noir film and

00:09:26
that's where it starts to get into like the more interesting

00:09:29
aspects of the movie that I did click with.

00:09:32
But it's sort of like a, you know, a modern noir style film.

00:09:36
And so he's doing this voice over and he essentially says

00:09:39
that he was like, you know, they were telling me about this, this

00:09:42
undercover thing. And I was like, man, I don't

00:09:44
want to do that. And then he's saying this like

00:09:46
as he's doing it. And it's like, well, why'd you

00:09:48
do it then? Like what?

00:09:52
Yeah, I mean, I guess I also, I've given things to do at work

00:09:55
that I don't feel like doing, but kind of a weird motivation

00:09:58
for your heroic lead. But it, I mean, it ties into

00:10:02
what his whole character is because basically there is a

00:10:04
flashback at the beginning where like his dad is like a drug

00:10:08
addict and he gets shot trying to like rob a liquor store.

00:10:12
And so, you know, early on, like Laurence Fishburne's character

00:10:15
is like, I've never touched drugs.

00:10:18
I don't even drink. You know, he's like, I promised

00:10:21
myself I'd never get into that kind of stuff, but he's brought

00:10:26
in by this DEA agent and he's the one that tells him like, you

00:10:31
know, we looked at your psychological profile and you're

00:10:33
actually perfect for this type of work.

00:10:36
So I guess they convinced him to do it cuz they convinced him

00:10:38
he's going to be doing a good thing.

00:10:41
But yeah, then I mean, then again, this is like in the first

00:10:47
20-30 minutes of the movie, you're seeing a lot of like

00:10:50
unfortunate imagery of like street crime and like drug abuse

00:10:56
and these these like people in like Skid Row Los Angeles that

00:10:59
are the part like of this like crack epidemic that's going on.

00:11:04
So that was the part of the movie where I was like, I don't

00:11:07
want to two hours of this like you.

00:11:10
Know no, I'm completely with you.

00:11:11
I, I wouldn't have even recommended it if that was if I

00:11:14
knew that was a part of it. Because I will say that over

00:11:16
time I've become increasingly just like bummed out watching

00:11:19
stuff like that, even though it's a part of a lot of good

00:11:23
filmmaking. I I just, I don't like sitting

00:11:26
through it either. Yeah, so I mean, that's just a

00:11:27
personal preference thing. But I did also recognize early

00:11:31
on that the film definitely had a unique style and like voice to

00:11:38
it, which is where Grifters completely fell flat because it

00:11:41
was like unfortunate imagery and, and story with like no

00:11:45
style or substance to it, Whereas Deep Bopper has is like

00:11:50
full of that. I mean, it has like there's

00:11:53
really good filmmaking going on there.

00:11:55
And that's what kind of kept me with it.

00:11:58
You know, like the cinematography is, is excellent

00:12:01
and like stylish, like there's a lot of like unique lighting and

00:12:06
like, you know, the costumes are great.

00:12:11
The performances are strong. Like all of these, like, you

00:12:15
know, technical filmmaking aspects.

00:12:17
It has a lot of the intention behind it.

00:12:20
So it's like, you know, it was really well like directed and

00:12:24
executed in that way. So that's so that is why I was

00:12:27
like, OK, I can at least appreciate this even though I'm

00:12:31
not. This isn't the type of movie I

00:12:33
would normally just throw on to watch basically.

00:12:36
Yeah. OK, that's interesting.

00:12:37
So this is just one of those like, if you're in the mood for

00:12:40
a more kind of serious and heavy adult film experience, you know,

00:12:45
a lot of what I've picked for you so far is very goofy stuff,

00:12:48
and I unintentionally picked a much more harrowing 1.

00:12:52
Which I mean, that's fine in and of itself because at least this

00:12:55
movie I feel like had something to say.

00:12:59
I mean, it was it was, I was looking at the the trivia and it

00:13:02
was released like just weeks before the LA riots.

00:13:06
And so it's very like topical in that sense.

00:13:10
And again, once I kind of recognized the the strong film

00:13:17
making happening, I was looking up like the cinematographer and

00:13:20
the director to kind of see previous things that they've

00:13:23
worked on. And you know, the director, Bill

00:13:27
Duke, a lot of his work centers around like the black

00:13:31
experience. And you know, for Laurence

00:13:33
Fishburne to be the lead of this movie in 1992, like, you know,

00:13:37
it, it definitely was speaking to what was happening in the

00:13:42
real world at the time. But it's just again, it's like

00:13:46
some of it just came off as goofy.

00:13:48
So it's just like there's there was like that weird kind of

00:13:50
disconnect with this violent, like traumatic imagery and like,

00:13:55
like some of the stuff just not landing I think the way they

00:13:57
intended. But I can kind of get more into

00:14:01
that stuff later. But yeah, I mean, Laurence

00:14:05
Fishburne kills it as the lead. Jeff Goldblum.

00:14:08
Don't know if they're presented as Co leads but it you know it

00:14:12
is all from Laurence Fishburne's perspective.

00:14:14
Is Goldblum like the villain or is he another cop guy?

00:14:18
No. Well, they are friends.

00:14:22
They honestly a lot happens in this movie.

00:14:25
There's a lot to like to like recap to to really get into it.

00:14:29
So like Laurence Fishburne, he goes undercover and starts like

00:14:33
selling drugs on the street because they want him to get

00:14:36
closer to these higher ups in this drug syndicate cartel,

00:14:41
whatever the the proper term is. I'm not sure actually.

00:14:46
You guys got one of them Syndicate cartels over here.

00:14:48
He's. Just he's like a really bad

00:14:52
addict. That's a good premise actually.

00:14:54
Is the idea of taking someone who's never done drugs or had

00:14:57
alcohol and trying to make him be like an undercover drug

00:14:59
dealer like that is sort of a comedy premise if you play it

00:15:02
differently? Yeah.

00:15:03
But, you know, what's interesting is, like, I thought

00:15:06
there would be an obvious that's like a setup for, like a scene.

00:15:10
And it kind of happens. You know, I was like, OK, so

00:15:12
there's going to be a scene where they want him to take the

00:15:16
drugs, you know, like, yeah. And there is a scene where

00:15:19
somebody, like, offers him drugs and he's like, not for me.

00:15:23
And they're like, well, this guy's a cop and.

00:15:28
Rather than like, like lay into that tension at all, they're

00:15:31
just like, Nope, definitely a cop.

00:15:33
Yeah. But then they kind of move past

00:15:35
that. He kind of like, he just kind of

00:15:36
like talks his way out of it. So, you know, to jump ahead a

00:15:41
bit, he he does wind up taking drugs later in the movie, but

00:15:45
it's more like because he's at his like breaking point and he

00:15:48
just decides to like he just has a drink at one point.

00:15:52
He's like, this is my first drink.

00:15:54
It's pretty good. Is he announcing it to

00:15:57
everybody? He's.

00:15:58
He's talking, he's talking to another character, he's talking

00:16:01
to the DEA guy. And I was like.

00:16:03
Just out on the corner where he's doing his drug deals, like

00:16:05
just in case you don't know. Hey you guys tried alcohol it's

00:16:09
not bad. Crazy, right?

00:16:11
It was illegal for a while. That, yeah, history lesson.

00:16:24
That's how bad he is. No, he's actually really good at

00:16:27
being an undercover cop. That's the whole thing.

00:16:30
So to answer your previous question, him and Jeff Goldblum,

00:16:33
Jeff Goldblum is like one of the higher ups in this group.

00:16:36
And so he like while he's undercover, gets close to him

00:16:40
and they become friends and they start working together.

00:16:44
And so that's where like that connection comes in.

00:16:48
But you know, Goldblum, he's not as heavily featured in the movie

00:16:51
as Laurence Fishburne is. But it's cuz Laurence Fishburne

00:16:54
has so many like quest lines going on at the same time.

00:16:59
He's doing so many things. Like, you know, it's like every

00:17:03
scene, it's like either him, he's hanging out with Jeff

00:17:05
Goldblum or he's talking to the DEA guy, or he's with like his

00:17:09
love interest in the movie or he's with these other crime

00:17:13
guys. That's not the right word, but

00:17:15
whatever. Crime guy, crime syndicate,

00:17:17
buddies, you know. Yeah, yeah.

00:17:20
So yeah, they're they're friends in the movie.

00:17:22
Goldblum gives a really just Goldblum esque performance, but

00:17:26
he's actually like, honestly probably one of the better

00:17:29
performances I've seen from him. You know, I think it's OK.

00:17:33
Like I think he's especially later in his career, one of

00:17:37
those actors who's almost become like a Flanderized version of

00:17:42
himself. Yeah, I mean, he's basically

00:17:44
been playing the same guy ever since, like Jurassic Park.

00:17:49
Yes, exactly. And this is more so him giving a

00:17:51
real performance. So I was like, well, this is

00:17:54
good. I mean, he's a good actor.

00:17:56
Yeah, I like Jeff Goldblum a lot.

00:17:57
Again, I was hoping we would see like a real performance out of

00:18:00
him in this one. Yes, you definitely do.

00:18:02
Yeah, that's one of the stronger.

00:18:05
Like I said, everything is executed not just well, but

00:18:09
like, stylistically, there's a lot going on here.

00:18:12
And as the plot starts unfolding and, like, layering on itself, I

00:18:17
was like for the second-half of the film, I was like, OK, I'm

00:18:20
with this now I'm interested, like in seeing where this goes

00:18:23
because to like, jump forward a bit, basically, like Orange

00:18:28
Fishburne, you know, he gets pretty deep into this whole

00:18:33
thing. And at one point he's like, you

00:18:35
know, am I a cop pretending to be a drug dealer or am I drug

00:18:40
dealer pretending to be a cop at this point, you know, he's, he's

00:18:42
very like mixed up in, in this world.

00:18:46
But that leads to just some of this is where the like movie

00:18:49
logic stuff starts getting in there.

00:18:52
And I was like, what the heck is happening 'cause there's,

00:18:55
there's one character who I don't know if this was the

00:18:59
movies, like one attempt to like add in some like levity or

00:19:05
comedy, but there was a character who was like, he was

00:19:12
like another drug dealer. He's like one of the like the

00:19:14
street level drug dealers, right?

00:19:16
And the first time you see him, like there's this young kid,

00:19:20
he's like 12 or 13, like selling drugs on the corner.

00:19:22
And this guy comes up to him and he's just like, I told you not

00:19:25
to come around here again. And then the kid like runs away

00:19:28
and the guy just like pulls out a gun and he says like hasta La

00:19:32
Vista baby and he shoots him in the back.

00:19:34
What? That's a new reference at the

00:19:36
time. I know.

00:19:37
And like he, but he didn't say it like he didn't do like an

00:19:40
Arnold accent or anything. He just kind of said it.

00:19:43
And so I didn't really, it didn't really like register that

00:19:45
much to me. I was like, OK, whatever.

00:19:46
He's saying the Terminator thing.

00:19:49
But then later that character comes back and he gets into an

00:19:53
argument with Laurence Fishburne.

00:19:55
Like Laurence Fishburne pulls out a gun and like, he backs off

00:19:58
and he's just like, I'll be back.

00:20:01
I'll be back. And he's like, you seen that

00:20:04
movie? Rent it at your local video

00:20:06
store. And I was like, wait, what?

00:20:07
So he's just always doing this? He's always doing this.

00:20:11
Just a big fan of T2 Judgement Day I.

00:20:14
Guess so. I was like, it didn't click for

00:20:16
me until then. Then I was like, oh, he's always

00:20:19
saying Terminator stuff. But like, again, he's not doing

00:20:22
like the Arnold accent. He's just kind of saying it.

00:20:25
And I was like, what is going on with this guy?

00:20:27
And like, his performance was very exaggerated.

00:20:30
And then like, there's this leads to a scene where after

00:20:34
that interaction, once Fishburne is talking to Jeff Goldblum,

00:20:39
Jeff Goldblum's like, well, we gotta kill that guy.

00:20:41
You know, like, that's just what we gotta do.

00:20:44
And fisherman's like, OK. And then he goes to do it and

00:20:48
I'm like, wait, what? Like, is that allowed for an

00:20:50
undercover cop? You can just go around killing

00:20:52
people. Good question.

00:20:54
Good question. That's gonna have to go in his

00:20:55
report. Yeah, Yeah.

00:20:57
It's gonna be bullets that are like tried alcohol, thumbs up,

00:21:01
shot a guy, question mark. Bullets.

00:21:03
He's just shooting paper. Hasta La Vista paper.

00:21:08
He's like. I do like it.

00:21:10
It is funny, but yeah, even, like, even that seem where he's,

00:21:14
like, forced to kill this guy. It's supposed to be this, like,

00:21:19
dramatic turning point for Laurence Fishburne.

00:21:21
But like, the guy's performance in that scene is also like,

00:21:24
comical in a way. And I'm like, I don't know what

00:21:28
I'm supposed to feel about this character.

00:21:30
I like him, he's interesting, but I don't know what like the

00:21:33
intention is here. This side plot this has, this

00:21:37
has stolen all my attention. This doesn't make any sense to

00:21:40
me at all. Like, why in writing a like,

00:21:43
grounded, kind of demoralizing story about the undercover world

00:21:48
of of drug trafficking, which you specify so heavily that this

00:21:54
guy just loves the recently released film Terminator 2?

00:21:58
Yeah, yeah. Like that.

00:22:00
That's like his persona, but even he doesn't fully commit to

00:22:03
it. He just kind of like bluntly

00:22:04
says the lines. Like he literally said he was

00:22:08
like, go rent the movie. Like.

00:22:09
So he's like, what? It's advertising.

00:22:12
Yeah. Yeah, I don't know.

00:22:15
This movie was released by New Line Cinema, by the way.

00:22:18
I did like seeing that logo right at the.

00:22:20
Beginning well new line. The classic like New Line

00:22:24
Cinema. And Speaking of that, actually

00:22:26
to jump into something else I thought was very funny.

00:22:30
There was a scene, it's actually the scene where Laurence

00:22:32
Fishburne tracks that guy down to kill him.

00:22:36
He goes into a nightclub that this guy's in and there's this

00:22:40
dude performing on stage. And the way that this scene of

00:22:44
the guy on stage is, like the way it's lit, the way it's shot

00:22:49
and everything just reminded me of like Vanilla Ice in the Ninja

00:22:56
Turtles movie in Secret of. Yeah, yeah, even.

00:23:02
Cuz even the way the guy's on stage, like rapping, like the

00:23:04
type of musical performance he's giving is even similar to like

00:23:08
this. Is from the same year as Secret

00:23:10
of the Years. They're both 1992.

00:23:12
Yeah, yeah. I was like, I guess that's just

00:23:15
what like nightclubs looks like thin.

00:23:19
Because I could picture the Vanilla Ice scene very clearly

00:23:22
the kind of like significantly elevated stage and sort of like

00:23:27
just like flat dance floor underneath and very like comes

00:23:29
red. Lighting scheme, yeah, Now just

00:23:32
take that and change absolutely nothing.

00:23:34
And that's what it is. So you want to start there and

00:23:39
then also stop because you're done.

00:23:42
That's it, You've got it now. Go ninja go, ninja, go.

00:23:47
That's what I was picturing and I was like, oh, hey, I'm like,

00:23:49
yeah, like you said, same year, same studio.

00:23:52
Fun piece of trivia if if you like Ninja Turtles too, that

00:23:55
club is called the Dock Shore Club which you see for like 2

00:23:59
frames in that movie because I think Mikey gets thrown through

00:24:02
a door and it says like Dock Shore club this way and then

00:24:05
that's where they go. So that's a cool idea for a club

00:24:08
because it's like built into the side of a dock or something,

00:24:12
like it's right. By water, Yeah.

00:24:13
It's like a pier, which I think is just a story necessity for

00:24:15
Ninja Turtles because they jump out into the water at the end

00:24:18
when they fight Super Shredder. But yeah, maybe it's a real type

00:24:22
of thing. I don't know.

00:24:23
Probably smells bad, though. Like, probably smells bad.

00:24:25
That's exactly what I was thinking.

00:24:26
I was like, hey, you want to go down to the dock?

00:24:28
Shore Club smells like dead fish.

00:24:33
Cool. Things polluted as hell.

00:24:35
Did you try alcohol by the way? Pretty good.

00:24:39
Pretty good, gotta say. So anyway, like big.

00:24:46
Anyway, it's just like like where I don't even know where to

00:24:52
go next with deep cover like. I'm, I'm tempted to say that

00:24:54
like, I know sometimes we really dig into the plots because it

00:24:57
it's really crucial to our thoughts on the movie, but I

00:25:00
don't know that you necessarily need to give the audience

00:25:03
everything because it sounds like if you're in the mood for

00:25:06
that kind of movie, maybe it is fairly good.

00:25:09
Sure. Yeah.

00:25:10
I mean, it's, it's definitely like executed thoughtfully, like

00:25:15
artistically, like it has vision and style and I appreciate all

00:25:21
those things about it. And again, the second-half of

00:25:24
the movie gets pretty interesting, I will say.

00:25:28
Like, the way they get to the climax of the movie feels clunky

00:25:33
to me because this kind of goes back to like, you know, the

00:25:38
movie logic of what being an undercover cop means, I guess

00:25:42
because like, Laurence Fishburne does just go kill that guy.

00:25:46
Like, he just fought. He's in that nightclub, dance

00:25:49
club, whatever, follows him in the bathroom and just shoots

00:25:51
him. And then later he's talking to

00:25:53
his DA boss and he's like, so he killed that guy, huh?

00:25:58
That's cool. Anyway, we're just going to move

00:26:02
on. And then like, there's another

00:26:04
scene he has with that guy later where, and this is where he has

00:26:07
that kind of moment where he's like, not sure what he wants to

00:26:12
do or what he's been doing. Because basically they tell him

00:26:15
they're like, oh, things have changed.

00:26:17
They're like this this guy who's at the head of this organization

00:26:20
that we were trying to take down.

00:26:22
We like him now because we want him to, you know, run for

00:26:25
political office in the country he's from.

00:26:28
But he's the guy that's been bringing these drugs into the

00:26:30
US. So Laurence Fishburne just get

00:26:33
super pissed off. He was like, so this is all for

00:26:35
nothing, whatever. And he's like, basically like I

00:26:38
quit. I'm going to go be a drug dealer

00:26:40
now. I like that better and.

00:26:44
OK, straight to jail. Yeah, I was.

00:26:46
So he was just like. He's just like that out loud.

00:26:49
He's basically like, he's like, that's not how this works.

00:26:52
You can't just do that. And he was like bye.

00:26:54
And that's what he takes the alcohol and he's like pretty

00:26:56
good and so like. Oh, it's that late in the movie.

00:26:59
OK. Yeah, yeah.

00:27:01
And then he goes and he's doing coke or whatever.

00:27:04
And like, so he's like at this point, seemingly fully committed

00:27:08
to this lifestyle. And so I'm watching and I'm

00:27:10
like, OK, so this is, we're leading to some kind of like,

00:27:14
tragic ending for his character where he does fall, you know,

00:27:19
fully into this lifestyle and he's going to die or get

00:27:22
arrested or something. You know, it's like his dad died

00:27:25
because of it. Yeah.

00:27:27
But then at the end of the movie, he's with Jeff Goldblum.

00:27:32
And there's this one detective who's been, like, trying to get

00:27:35
through to Laurence Fishburne because he doesn't know that

00:27:39
he's undercover. He thinks he is just this kind

00:27:41
of drug dealer. And he's been trying to get him

00:27:44
to go straight, basically, and, like, work with the cops.

00:27:47
And, you know, Laurence Fishburne's always blown him off

00:27:49
throughout the whole movie. But then he shows up at the end

00:27:51
while they're trying to do this big drug deal, and Jeff Goldblum

00:27:54
shoots him, shoots Laurence Fishburne's.

00:27:57
Cop friend. It's the nice cop, OK?

00:27:59
Yeah. And, like, Lawrence Fisherman

00:28:01
is, like, distraught over this. And then he's, like telling Jeff

00:28:04
Goldblum he was like, I'm a cop, you're under arrest.

00:28:07
And I'm like, no, you're not Lawrence Fishburn.

00:28:09
You quit. You decide.

00:28:10
You quit. You updated your LinkedIn weeks

00:28:13
ago to say drug dealer. It's like just kind of going

00:28:16
back and forth here. And so that's like how those

00:28:20
two, like, get into conflict with each other at the end.

00:28:23
And then, like, Lawrence Fishburn winds up shooting Jeff

00:28:25
Goldblum and then it just kind of cuts.

00:28:28
And he's like presenting this case of him being undercover.

00:28:34
Like he was like, I don't know, like everything went according

00:28:37
to plan. I was like, I think that's how

00:28:41
this works. But like, you just went and like

00:28:44
killed people and like did all this stuff and walked away from

00:28:48
being a cop or whatever. And then, like, he, like, makes

00:28:51
a deal with the DEA guy. He was like, you're not going to

00:28:55
charge me for anything or whatever.

00:28:57
And I'm going to make sure that, like, you know, I won't talk bad

00:29:00
about your agency. And he's like, OK, bet.

00:29:04
But then, like, the twist reveal at the end is that, like,

00:29:07
Laurence Fishburne had, like, had someone recording this drug

00:29:12
deal with the guy that the DEA decided that they liked and

00:29:18
wanted to, you know, run for office.

00:29:21
And he, like, released that out to the public.

00:29:23
And he was like, ha, gotcha. And then, like, his DEA boss

00:29:26
gets all mad at him. And they're like, in the

00:29:27
courtroom still in North Fishburne, just, like, punches

00:29:30
him in the stomach. And I was like, what are the

00:29:32
rules here? Just do whatever he wants.

00:29:39
That's funny. There's.

00:29:40
Just no consequences for everything, anything he does.

00:29:43
And then he like he had stolen all this money from this drug

00:29:47
dealer guy. And so he walks away like it's

00:29:50
just such a like happy ending for his character.

00:29:53
And then he goes back to finish this, like, adopt A kids side

00:29:57
quest that he started in the beginning of the movie that I

00:29:59
had forgotten about because when he first went undercover, he

00:30:04
was, like, living in this, like, rundown building.

00:30:06
And there was this woman across the hall who had, like, you

00:30:08
know, like a young kid. And she was messed up and

00:30:12
tweaking out the whole time. And he kind of, like, formed a

00:30:14
connection with this kid. This is all in, like, the first

00:30:16
act. And then, like, the movie

00:30:17
completely forgets about it up until, like, the very end when

00:30:21
Fishburne's like, oh, yeah, I got to go get that kid.

00:30:23
And then he does what? I was like, I thought we moved

00:30:27
on from that. Like, I didn't realize that this

00:30:29
kid was still a part of the story.

00:30:31
And that's how the movie ends. And I was.

00:30:33
Like that's so strange. Yeah, yeah.

00:30:36
So it felt a little like I was saying before, for as much like

00:30:39
style and intentionality to intentionality that it had, it

00:30:44
felt a little unfocused with its story because it was trying to

00:30:49
do so much at once, you know, and it wound up trying to, like,

00:30:53
cram a lot in there. You landed on the right

00:30:55
language. It sounds like Laurence

00:30:56
Fishburne is a video game protagonist.

00:30:58
Because if you play something like like Fallout or Elder

00:31:03
Scrolls, one of those like RPGs that's full of quest lines and

00:31:05
different routes you can go down, they all have to resolve

00:31:09
in a way that just pushes you on to the next thing.

00:31:11
Even if theoretically some of these events either contradict

00:31:13
each other or would have like obvious consequences for your

00:31:16
character. But if he's like the main

00:31:19
character of the universe, because it's his video game, he

00:31:21
just, he can't just move on. He's in like using Grand Theft

00:31:23
Auto logic by the end of this movie.

00:31:25
He basically is Speaking of video games too.

00:31:28
It's so funny, the kid that like young boy who he like adopts, I

00:31:32
guess at the end it was like, I don't know if they thought they

00:31:38
maybe couldn't get sort of a dramatic performance out of this

00:31:42
kid because he's really young. So literally every time you see

00:31:46
him, he's playing a Game Boy. And it's like the the old, like

00:31:51
before the Game Boy Color, like the original, like chunky Game

00:31:54
Boy. Oh yeah, yeah.

00:31:55
You know, And he just like has the same blank, like he doesn't

00:31:59
look distraught in any way. He looks like he's just having

00:32:01
the time of his life playing this Game Boy as things are

00:32:04
happening around me and I'm like, he's just like me for

00:32:06
real, but. He's just like, blankly staring

00:32:12
an old prick Game Boy. Just like Man Mondays, Yeah.

00:32:16
It's so funny because I'm just like, this kid doesn't seem to

00:32:20
care about any of this. He's playing Mario or something,

00:32:23
I don't know. But yeah, that's that's a good

00:32:25
way to put it. Laurence Fishburne just moves

00:32:27
through this world with no consequences, does whatever he

00:32:30
wants. And also doesn't seem to let the

00:32:33
audience in on his perspective enough because it feels like he

00:32:37
was like deceiving you into what he wanted to do next.

00:32:41
Yeah, almost because I mean, they're like he has these voice

00:32:45
overs, these very like detective noir style voice overs.

00:32:49
They're kind of intermittent throughout the film.

00:32:52
You know, towards the end, I think there's one maybe right at

00:32:55
the end, but they're sparse. They're you know, they're just

00:32:59
kind of sprinkled throughout. So it's like you are getting a

00:33:02
sense of what he's thinking throughout the movie.

00:33:05
But I mean, even that, like, I guess it was set up, but even

00:33:09
that kind of like big twist at the end where he was like, ha, I

00:33:12
got this guy. I was like, Oh yeah, I guess so.

00:33:15
I mean, you were doing so many other things like I yeah, sure,

00:33:19
we can do that. That's weird.

00:33:21
I don't, I don't know, I just can't visualize the story.

00:33:25
Like there's so many elements going on here.

00:33:27
And like you said, the almost flip flopping nature of it, like

00:33:30
a lot of it was clearly done with intention that I'm just not

00:33:32
following. But sounds like a weird way to

00:33:35
pitch a movie that was trying to be like a somewhat serious like

00:33:39
life of crime and drugs, you know?

00:33:41
Yeah, yeah. And I, and I think it wanted to

00:33:46
do that in a way that it was like entertaining at the same

00:33:52
time, you know, like it didn't want to be too matter of fact

00:33:56
and dour about the whole thing. Which is a this is a problem I

00:34:00
see with a lot of films that try to tackle like serious subjects.

00:34:03
I think I've heard it phrased before is like, you know, there

00:34:06
are no anti war movies because any film that tries to depict

00:34:12
the horrors of war is still sort of glorifying it and that it's

00:34:16
entertaining you with it. And and that kind of undercuts

00:34:19
any sort of messaging the story might have about whether what's

00:34:23
being shown on screen is bad. You know, like you can't

00:34:25
necessarily rely on an audience to make the same inference as

00:34:29
the author that like this is bad.

00:34:30
If you watched it and you're like, that was fun.

00:34:32
Laurence Fishburne shot a guy and drank a bunch of alcohol.

00:34:35
Well. I mean, I, I exactly, I and I

00:34:39
think that's like a similar case has been made for like there's

00:34:43
so many movies where you have like your action cop character

00:34:47
and this isn't, this is more of a kind of crime thriller, but it

00:34:50
still has action elements too. And I mean, you know, that

00:34:54
inspires a lot of people to think that that cops can just do

00:34:58
whatever they want to go around shooting people with no

00:35:00
consequences, You know, like, because that's how they do it in

00:35:03
the movies. I think if the movie ends with

00:35:05
him like sinking into the life of like, like a drug addict and

00:35:10
drug peddler in a way that it's all he has left because he ruins

00:35:13
every other chance he has. Like that's an ending.

00:35:15
And I could see that. But I guess they wanted more of

00:35:19
a wish fulfillment angle. And I don't know.

00:35:22
I mean, we were just complaining.

00:35:23
The opening of the movie was too sad.

00:35:25
Maybe that's what they thought. Well, they wanted to send the

00:35:28
audience home happy is what they wanted to do.

00:35:30
Because I mean, even at one point prior to the ending, like

00:35:33
his love interest in the movie, he kind of sends her away

00:35:36
because he's like, you know, things are getting dangerous

00:35:38
here and he's like, are we done? And she's like, we're done.

00:35:42
If you're still doing this. He's like, she's, you know,

00:35:45
she's like, you can come with me.

00:35:46
But then like the the DEA like picks her up.

00:35:49
Like she's trying to like leave and go to the airport and, you

00:35:52
know, just start a new life somewhere.

00:35:53
But they grab her because she's kind of been involved in this

00:35:55
too. And so like, that's part of the

00:35:59
deal that he makes at the end is like, you know, when I speak to

00:36:02
whoever he was talking to Congress, I guess like someone

00:36:06
like whatever that that was at the end, like he's like, you

00:36:12
know, you got to let her go too. So it's kind of like even like

00:36:16
repairs that relationship at the end as well, like with her.

00:36:20
So it's like everything works out for him.

00:36:21
And it's like, yeah, I feel like that almost isn't the story that

00:36:25
you set up, though, so. So interesting.

00:36:28
It makes me wonder if the trajectory of the, like, third

00:36:33
act was ever different. You know, like if maybe at one

00:36:35
point on the page it was more sad and like a downer, and then

00:36:37
it got changed. Because sometimes I'll think

00:36:39
that and then it'll be like, no, that was the original intention

00:36:41
all along. But definitely seems like a

00:36:44
surprise for how the rest of the film had been set up.

00:36:47
I wouldn't be surprised if this was the original ending in mind,

00:36:51
you know, it felt that way. It's it felt despite like what

00:36:56
felt like clunky elements to me, it didn't feel like an

00:37:00
incomplete story in any way. OK, so it definitely it had an

00:37:06
arc to it and his character went on this journey and was changed

00:37:11
by the end. It just, I guess maybe me

00:37:15
watching it, I thought at some point, like around the middle,

00:37:18
like when he was like, yeah, I'm going to go be a like, I'm done

00:37:21
being a cop. I'm going to go just be a crime

00:37:23
board now. I was like, oh, that's fun.

00:37:24
Let's see where this goes. Like, yeah, OK, this is maybe my

00:37:27
other pending question. Why did he like being a drug

00:37:31
dealer? Like what did the movie show you

00:37:32
that made him a fan of that side of the coin?

00:37:37
So this. Was even like an interesting

00:37:39
conversation he had with his DA boss at one point, because when

00:37:42
they're having that conversation, well, I should say

00:37:45
prior to that you're telling him basically they're like you have

00:37:48
to look the part like, you know, as he moves his way up through

00:37:51
this world, they're like, you know, you got to start dressing

00:37:54
nice and like get a new place and you know, drive around a new

00:37:57
nice car like. And so through his voice over

00:38:01
narration, he was like, well, this is nice.

00:38:02
You know, I'm like a big shot on the streets.

00:38:06
So he's like, that's cool, this. Guy's so simple, you know, he

00:38:09
just lives in the moment. He's just like that.

00:38:11
I had all these like perspectives and hardline rules

00:38:15
for myself, and it turns out cars and booze not.

00:38:18
Bad. Yeah, yeah.

00:38:20
And it's like the other characters even kind of call

00:38:22
them out on that, too. Jeff Goldblum at the end, like

00:38:25
their whole conversation, he's like, I don't care that you're a

00:38:28
cop. We got millions of dollars in

00:38:30
this van. Let's get the hell.

00:38:31
Out of here, you know, like he's.

00:38:33
Just and then when he's talking to the to his, the guy who

00:38:36
brought him in, the DEA guy, he's like, you know, the DEA

00:38:39
guy's trying to tell him he's like, we're done with this whole

00:38:41
operation. You know, let's they're they're

00:38:43
offering us, you know, to go to Washington and and do something

00:38:46
else. There will be big shots there.

00:38:48
Once Fishburn's like, I'm a big shot here.

00:38:50
He's like, I don't need to go do that.

00:38:52
Like I'm. Going to do this that that makes

00:38:54
sense. I wasn't sure if the angle was

00:38:56
like the lore of a life of crime or if there was some other take

00:39:00
on it, like it being the community he had found himself

00:39:03
in. Because those are like the two

00:39:04
versions, you know, you get the the Fast and Furious angle is

00:39:08
like, oh, no, I've become sort of swept up in the found family

00:39:12
of this gang of criminals. And then the other one is like

00:39:15
Scarface, like, oh, I just want to be rich and do crime.

00:39:21
Yeah, no, it was. It was Scarface.

00:39:24
It was OK. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

00:39:25
The world is yours. Yeah, it was not.

00:39:28
Ohana means family. Paul Walker.

00:39:30
It was. I hope someone thinks that's

00:39:33
from Fast and Furious. What is that Lilo and stitch?

00:39:37
Yeah, yeah. No, I mean, as like, as far as I

00:39:43
can tell, at least as far as what the movie presented, which

00:39:46
is almost what made it kind of jarring to like, I was saying

00:39:50
what led to that conclusion where he was so distraught over

00:39:55
this cop who was like trying to set him on the right path.

00:39:59
But, you know, it was like his like, obviously it was like his

00:40:02
conscience. You know, he was like, OK, like

00:40:04
I have, I've gone too deep. You know, deep cover if you.

00:40:08
Will deep cover? So it made sense in that way,

00:40:14
which is again what makes me think you know this.

00:40:16
This didn't, it didn't feel like there was holes in this plot.

00:40:19
It felt like it went where it wanted to go, but it was it was

00:40:26
like wish fulfillment along the way, so.

00:40:29
I'm very curious toward the end of our show what this is going

00:40:32
to do to your score for the movie, because this feels like a

00:40:35
toss up between how much you liked the ride versus what you

00:40:40
thought of, like the validity of that as an ending.

00:40:44
I mean, the ending there's actually so in the in the scene

00:40:49
where Lord Fishburne winds up shooting Jeff Goldblum

00:40:53
throughout the movie, they kind of again, this is another like

00:40:56
light attempt at like I guess comedy or levity, but they're

00:41:00
kind of having this back and forth conversation in different

00:41:03
scenes throughout the movie about like they're like, oh,

00:41:05
what's the weirdest thing you've ever done sexually?

00:41:09
Oh. OK.

00:41:10
It's fine. It's it's light hearted, you

00:41:12
know, it's, it's whatever. It's just to kind of show their

00:41:14
friendship. And Jeff Goldblum brings that

00:41:18
line back, you know, while he's trying to, like, diffuse the

00:41:22
situation between them. At the end, he's like, what'd

00:41:24
you say? The weirdest thing you ever did

00:41:25
sexually was. And Laurence Fishburne's like,

00:41:28
man, nothing seems that weird anymore.

00:41:29
I was like, that's a good line. And also how I feel about this

00:41:32
movie because like, what do we? Like that, I must say your your

00:41:40
skills as a film reviewer are growing because that is such a

00:41:42
funny button to sum up your thoughts on.

00:41:47
Yeah, just like, all right, whatever you want to do, movie

00:41:51
you, you're in charge. You know what, I almost tapped

00:41:54
out at the beginning, but by staying I feel like I've sort of

00:41:57
consented to whatever this is. We've all grown and tried booze

00:42:01
a long. Way yeah, that's the smash got

00:42:05
to you during the second act. Like you're just opening up like

00:42:08
a bottle of liquor. Like what the heck if Larry can

00:42:11
do it. This one's for you, Larry. 41

00:42:17
out on the couch. 41 out. OK, well, I'm I'm at a loss for

00:42:22
words, to be honest. About to cover.

00:42:24
But why don't we kick it over to our intermission and when we

00:42:27
return, we can go from talking about a film about crime to a

00:42:31
film starring a man accused of a crime.

00:42:33
Just stay tuned for Woody Allen, everybody.

00:42:37
Woody Allen's the name of the movie.

00:42:39
Yeah. Oh yeah.

00:42:39
I. Didn't say that, I tuned for

00:42:44
Everyone says I Love You starring alleged criminal.

00:42:47
What do you have? OK so Frank, we're back from the

00:43:00
intermission, but something funny has happened.

00:43:03
The audience just heard our deep cover review.

00:43:06
For them it was a few seconds ago, but for you and I it has

00:43:09
been 4 weeks. Yep, we time traveled.

00:43:13
Here if you could you tell the folks at home why it's been 4

00:43:17
weeks since we talked about this?

00:43:19
The future is bleak, humanity has collapsed, but this podcast

00:43:23
is still going. Yeah, Yep, Skynet has risen.

00:43:26
They like the show. They.

00:43:27
Liked it, kept us around. That's all right.

00:43:31
They were, they were knocking down doors and they were like,

00:43:33
hold on. Hang on a.

00:43:34
Second, I like this one. We're on to something here

00:43:37
anyway. Yeah, what was the question?

00:43:39
Why are we doing? This out it's been 4 weeks since

00:43:42
you and I originally recorded the second-half of this episode

00:43:45
where we talked about Woody Allen's Everyone Says I love

00:43:48
you, but due to a technical issue that audio got severely

00:43:51
corrupted. There's not really a good reason

00:43:54
for it. Essentially you and I that day

00:43:56
spoke for like such a long time before we started and then did

00:43:59
the whole episode that my computer started overheating.

00:44:03
So my audio on my end was captured.

00:44:05
Yours is fine. My audio was captured and it

00:44:08
showed me the waveform, so I thought it was fine, but then I

00:44:10
listened back to it and it sounded like I was speaking from

00:44:12
like inside a toaster. It was just like severe data

00:44:15
loss from my feed specifically. So, Frank, what did we say to

00:44:24
Woody Allen doing? You know, a long time ago.

00:44:33
Yeah, I think, I think you, you loved it.

00:44:35
You gave it like a 12 out of 10. Yeah. 2 out of 10, Like yeah.

00:44:41
Essentially, why did you ask me to watch a Woody Allen musical?

00:44:45
AKA what? What did I do to hurt you?

00:44:50
That sounds like the name of the musical, actually.

00:44:52
Oh, yeah. But we we talked about it in the

00:44:57
episode. But like, I think more so

00:44:58
coincidentally than anything else, we hadn't really seen.

00:45:00
Neither of us had seen in any of Woody Allen's films, right?

00:45:05
And it was just interesting to me that this one was a musical.

00:45:09
There was something else we hadn't done on the show before.

00:45:11
So I was like a Woody Allen musical.

00:45:13
And it had a great ensemble cast.

00:45:15
So yeah, I was just like all of. That is true.

00:45:18
That these are all and that's where the praise ends, I think

00:45:21
is. That is where the praise ends.

00:45:26
So to make a Long story short, I didn't like it it it is an

00:45:31
interesting movie. It is the classic Woody Allen

00:45:34
ensemble cast story told in much the same way as a lot of his

00:45:38
other more famous works. The gimmick of it being a

00:45:41
musical is both the most interesting thing about it and

00:45:44
the most frustrating. Because as I talked about in the

00:45:46
full recording, Woody Allen did this weird bit where he brought

00:45:49
in actors who are not trained singers and also had some who

00:45:54
could sing and kind of told them to sing poorly on purpose.

00:45:57
The gimmick with everyone says I love You, is it supposed to be

00:46:00
kind of like everyday people having the musical experience of

00:46:04
breaking into song to express, you know, how they feel because

00:46:09
the feeling is so powerful. And they do this by having folks

00:46:12
perform a lot of old music from like 30s and 40s musicals or old

00:46:16
jazz standards. So no, no original music was

00:46:19
written for this movie. It is essentially a cover album

00:46:22
from people who don't know how to sing, which Woody Allen

00:46:24
thought was really cool and I think annoyed the heck out of

00:46:28
me. Oh yeah, that yeah, that would

00:46:29
annoy me too. That's such a like, I mean, I

00:46:32
guess I understand the artistic intention behind that, but like

00:46:36
in in practice, that's terrible. This definitely feels like

00:46:39
something you get away with because you've already made like

00:46:42
12 really popular movies and won a bunch of awards.

00:46:44
Like no first time writer director is going to get this

00:46:48
pitch off the ground because it's just not.

00:46:51
It's so much better on paper as a funny little thought exercise

00:46:53
than as a movie that's almost two hours long.

00:46:57
Yeah, yeah. So it's interesting.

00:46:59
We do get the ensemble cast. The story is about this extended

00:47:03
family of like New York socialite type people.

00:47:06
Woody Allen is the father of this teenage girl called DJ.

00:47:12
She's like the narrator for the whole story and she explains

00:47:16
that she lives with her mother, her stepfather, and then both

00:47:19
her siblings from her mom's first marriage and her step

00:47:21
siblings. So it's kind of just this one

00:47:23
big dysfunctional family all dealing with different little

00:47:26
vignettes and stories about falling in love and how they

00:47:29
feel about it. And so we get series of

00:47:31
different numbers. Again, all covers of existing

00:47:33
music. I think the most notable one

00:47:36
that gets repeated in this movie is I'm Through With Love, which

00:47:40
was sung by Marilyn Monroe and Some Like It Hot and as I talked

00:47:43
about in the episode by Mary Jane Watson in Spider Man 3.

00:47:48
Yeah, yeah. Kirsten Dunst.

00:47:50
Kirsten Dunst. The cast is interesting.

00:47:53
We have like a young Edward Norton and Drew Barrymore.

00:47:56
Tim Roth is in it. Some of the more accomplished

00:47:58
actors at the time was like Alan Alda is there.

00:48:01
The thing that also dragged the movie down for me is that Woody

00:48:03
Allen is in fact in it, like all of his movies.

00:48:07
And as we talked about previous, Woody Allen reputation is shot.

00:48:11
I think a lot of people who were watching stuff at the time gave

00:48:14
him a benefit of the doubt. But this story in particular is

00:48:18
about Woody Allen's character deceiving this woman who's like

00:48:22
25 years younger than him and trying to fall in love with him.

00:48:26
And it just is such an analog to like the real life weirdness of

00:48:30
Woody Allen. And he's playing it so much just

00:48:32
as himself that I had a hard time separating it and it just

00:48:36
made me dislike him the moment the story begins.

00:48:38
And he never won me back. Yeah.

00:48:40
And is he, is he supposed to be an unlikeable character in the

00:48:43
movie too? I don't really.

00:48:44
I don't think so. I think he thinks he's he's he's

00:48:47
supposed to be neurotic because the like dialogue style that I

00:48:51
think Woody Allen really featured heavily in a lot of his

00:48:54
movies is this like constantly talking, kind of like yapping

00:48:58
dialogue where you're just over explaining everything and

00:49:01
there's a lot of overlapping chatter between different groups

00:49:03
of characters. I mean, there's a scene in this

00:49:05
one everyone says I love You where there's like a family

00:49:08
dinner going wrong and there's like 8 different people talking

00:49:10
at once in a scene that carries on that bit for like a minute of

00:49:14
screen time. It's such a long time to be

00:49:17
doing that, that it just gets grating so quickly.

00:49:20
And I don't know, I just, I'm the wrong audience for this

00:49:24
Woody Allen movie. I, I like musicals a lot.

00:49:27
I wish I could have liked this one more, but everything about

00:49:30
it, it was like uniquely frustrating for me to watch.

00:49:34
Yeah. And I mean, I also didn't

00:49:35
realize when I picked it that it was again, we had four weeks.

00:49:39
I didn't look up the term for this, but when it's when it's a

00:49:44
musical that is using existing music.

00:49:49
Like I don't know if there is a specific.

00:49:50
Term for that. But.

00:49:51
A more well known example that was good was like Moulin Rouge.

00:49:54
Moulin Rouge uses real music sung by new performers and kind

00:49:57
of added in the context of a different story.

00:49:59
Which hot take? That movie annoys me too.

00:50:02
Just interesting. Show some shade at Moulin Rouge

00:50:04
while we're here. Secret bonus episode Moulin

00:50:06
Rouge. But you know, yeah, Boulin

00:50:10
Rouge. Tell me about it.

00:50:13
So Moulin movie. I didn't really feel anything

00:50:16
for it. I but at the same time, I can't

00:50:19
knock it as being like poorly put together.

00:50:21
I mean, it's just a classic Woody Allen thing.

00:50:23
And I think a lot of the dialogue, if you liked his other

00:50:26
movies up till that point would still resonate here because it's

00:50:28
not like it's worse. It I mean, I haven't seen them,

00:50:30
but it doesn't seem like it'd be any worse than his other movies.

00:50:33
So I believe that at the end of the day, when we moved into our

00:50:36
closing, I gave Woody Allen's Everyone says I love you a three

00:50:40
out of 10. Let the record confirm because I

00:50:42
actually don't remember. A well earned 3 out of 10.

00:50:46
Well earned. I mean, I was hesitant.

00:50:48
I tried to go higher, I think. And you were like, no, no, no,

00:50:50
don't give him too much benefit of the doubt because like I

00:50:53
said, I did a bad job here. I was like, I don't like this

00:50:55
guy. He reads as creepy to me.

00:50:57
And this movie he made reads as creepy to me.

00:51:00
Yeah, I mean, whatever the scores are just based on

00:51:03
whatever you feel so. So it's a 3 out of 10.

00:51:06
It's not like to get lower than that would have to be like

00:51:08
approaching like this was just not a movie like not put

00:51:12
together properly or something. Really, really noticeably absent

00:51:15
to get A1 or A2. So what do you all got a three

00:51:18
out of 10? Frank, do you recall what you

00:51:20
gave deep cover? Because that that's the part of

00:51:23
the review that people heard unedited from when we first

00:51:25
spoke about it. Oh, I didn't know there would be

00:51:29
a quiz. I don't remember when I came

00:51:33
deep cover. You gave deep cover A5 out of

00:51:35
10. Oh, thanks.

00:51:36
So you knew. You knew the whole time I.

00:51:39
Was just trying to throw to you about it.

00:51:40
As I recall, you told me that you thought Deep Cover was

00:51:43
really well directed and put together, but then again, it

00:51:46
just kind of wasn't really your speed and that you thought it

00:51:49
was fine, but nothing like that really hooked you.

00:51:52
Yeah, no deep cover like executed like a lot of the

00:51:57
technical elements really well. I really liked the

00:51:59
cinematography and like the performances.

00:52:01
And I mean, honestly, it kind of like is is one of the movies of

00:52:06
all the ones we've done on this show that like I remember the

00:52:09
most fondly maybe, even though I didn't score it very high.

00:52:12
That's interesting. I think we're gonna at some

00:52:14
point probably do a bit of a retrospective on everything, and

00:52:17
I wonder if our thoughts about any of these will change because

00:52:19
this is our first time looking backwards at what we thought at

00:52:21
the time. Yeah, yeah.

00:52:23
But yeah, no deep cover. Like I don't know.

00:52:26
And I tend to skew more positive, so it's like I get

00:52:28
further away from it. I think I am more so just

00:52:30
remembering the things I did like about it as opposed to the

00:52:32
things that may have like turned me off.

00:52:35
That's interesting. That does mean that I win the

00:52:39
episode because the movie I recommended to you got a better

00:52:41
score than the one you gave to me.

00:52:43
And I think at this point, again, we're we're kind of in

00:52:45
the future. We just finished recording

00:52:47
Episode 7. But as of the end of this

00:52:49
episode that you're hearing now, Frank, I think I'm ahead in the

00:52:51
season 1 standings by like 4 points.

00:52:55
Not a lot. It's a close game.

00:52:56
Yeah, stay tuned. I think I win every other

00:52:59
episode after this, so you know. I kind of really like those

00:53:04
episodes a lot better. So in order to set that up for

00:53:09
episode 6, where apparently Frank wins because I won this

00:53:13
time, I got to go 1st, and I asked you to watch 1991's Doc

00:53:17
Hollywood, a comedy drama of sorts starring Michael J Fox.

00:53:23
Yeah, I can't wait to watch Doc Hollywood.

00:53:25
I can't wait to have already seen and reviewed.

00:53:29
Let me tell you that doc. He's so Hollywood, so Hollywood,

00:53:33
you wouldn't believe it. Yes, I picked that one out

00:53:36
because I like Michael J Fox. I have not seen him do much

00:53:39
outside of Back to the Future, his most famous stuff.

00:53:42
But I did watch a whole documentary recently about his

00:53:44
life in dealing with Parkinson's and how it affected his career

00:53:47
as an actor. And I just thought, I don't

00:53:49
know, he's just a very likable performer.

00:53:51
And I thought that this one would be kind of in the spirit

00:53:53
of, like, Welcome Home, Roxy Carmichael, the first movie I

00:53:56
had you watch, just a just a kind of 90s comedy that they

00:53:58
don't really make any more. Yeah.

00:54:00
Totally, and I won't spoil what I thought of it.

00:54:02
Yeah, 11 out of 10. So what did you ask me to watch

00:54:06
for our upcoming episode 6 You. Keep asking me these questions

00:54:09
that that you know the. Answers Come on Jackal Jackal.

00:54:13
You watch Bruce Willis and Richard Gere in 1997's Jackal, a

00:54:18
loose remake of the 70s film Day of the Jackal.

00:54:22
Yes, yes, which I picked. Because.

00:54:26
Because Bruce Willis. Mostly because Bruce Willis.

00:54:29
Yeah. I mean, we don't know a lot

00:54:31
about these movies because we haven't seen them.

00:54:32
So actor pairings is is often a key ingredient.

00:54:35
I do want to immortalize, for the record, that we had a funny

00:54:38
thing happened when this first conversation happened.

00:54:41
You actually selected a movie for me to watch that I had seen

00:54:44
before. You wanted me to watch a Michael

00:54:46
Douglas movie called The Game from the same year, I think, and

00:54:49
we had to hit the big whammy button because I had already

00:54:52
seen it. Yeah, yeah, that and the game

00:54:54
would have been a good choice that that the Jackal was my.

00:54:56
That's what I said. Backup choice, yeah.

00:54:59
Yeah, I, I, I said it on the air and you you would have heard it

00:55:02
in the full recording. But if I had been given the

00:55:04
game, given what I know about actually having seen it

00:55:06
previous, it would have been like a nine out of 10.

00:55:08
It's such a fun movie. So if anyone has not seen the

00:55:10
game, it's very fun, but unfortunately not show eligible.

00:55:15
So instead we're going to watch Jackal or I'm going to watch

00:55:18
Jackal, and hopefully even better.

00:55:21
Yeah, I assume so. Why not?

00:55:23
I assume so. We already talked about it, so

00:55:25
we know, but you're gonna have to come back in two weeks to

00:55:29
find out. Again, thank you so much for

00:55:31
listening to the episode. Our apologies for the technical

00:55:33
difficulties, but hopefully you got what you came for and we

00:55:36
will see you in two weeks. Bye.

00:55:40
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Bye.

00:55:42
Bye. Thank you for listening to our

00:55:57
show. Before we go tonight, I wanted

00:55:59
to give some additional updates about screenings for Nate and

00:56:02
Mariah in Venice, the film that Frank is Co producer on that is

00:56:05
currently on its Film Festival circuit tour.

00:56:08
We talked about this previously back in episode 3, but it's

00:56:11
coming up again now. The film is available to stream

00:56:13
digitally as part of the Richmond International Film

00:56:16
Festival beginning on September 23rd.

00:56:18
That's next week. You can actually buy your

00:56:20
tickets now for $5 in order to access the film during the time

00:56:23
it's screening at the festival. Again, more information on these

00:56:26
screenings can be found at the Sardonic Pictures website,

00:56:29
sardonicmp.com. The new announcement that we

00:56:33
have for tonight's episode is that the film is also screening

00:56:36
at the Glendale International Film Festival on Saturday,

00:56:39
September 27th. Again, that one's coming up very

00:56:42
soon. Tickets are on sale now, so

00:56:44
check out Sardonic mp.com, which is LinkedIn the description for

00:56:48
this episode. If you enjoyed tonight's show,

00:56:51
make sure to give it a rating, leave a comment, share it with a

00:56:53
friend, all the usual stuff. We also, as mentioned

00:56:56
previously, are on social media. You can find us on Instagram at

00:57:00
Meet Your Double Feature and on Blue Sky at Mydfpod.

00:57:04
Thanks again for joining us. We'll be back in two weeks with

00:57:07
our next episode of Meet Your Double Feature.

00:57:18
Coming up next, It's The Jackal, followed by Doc Hollywood on

00:57:24
Meet Your Double Feature.